As the campaign to become the Republican nominee for President in 2008, candidates Tom Tancredo and Duncan Hunter like to say that they are in favor of cutting government spending.
That’s not how they have voted as members of the House of Representatives, however. As members of Congress, Tancredo and Hunter have voted for Republican borrow-and-spend legislation over and over again, and they’ve voted against attempts by Democrats to bring Republican spending under control.
Consider, for example, the vote that Duncan Hunter and Tom Tancredo case in May of 2006 against an amendment designed to restore fiscal responsibility to logging in the Tongass National Forest in Alaska. The Tongass National Forest contains natural resources held in trust for the American people. Yet, under the Republicans, the government has been giving the timber away practically for free.
In 2005, for example, the federal government spent more than 48.5 million dollars subsidizing logging in the Tongass National Forest. In return, the government only got back $500,000 dollars in fees from loggers. That’s 48 million dollars worth of services the government just gave away, as some kind of Logging Welfare. And did the loggers then sell us their timber products at a discounted rate, in thanks for the government giveaways? Nope. They’re taking from the American people on both ends.
A bipartisan effort led by Republican Steve Chabot and Democrat Rob Andrews led to an amendment to end federal government subsidies for logging roads into the Tongass National Forest. Tom Tancredo and Duncan Hunter opposed this effort to restore fiscal responsibility to government land management. Tancredo and Hunter voted to keep the big government gravy train going.
(Sources: League of Conservation Voters, National Environmental Scorecard, 2006; Library of Congress)